It's a shame that when the media present programmes examining ghosts, paranormal behaviour - or as in this case - Helen Duncan, the famous psychic, the final analysis is always to imply it's all bunkum! This programme was no exception.
Robinson got a number of facts wrong. 'I'm going to a seance.' No Tony! A visit to the local Spititualist Church to hear a medium ' On The Platform' - which you did - isn't a seance!! Do your research! (:@)
Secondly. He says, near the end of the programme 'Well we've managed to establish that Helen Duncan was faking it ' No Tony! You established a number of ways she might have been faking and a number of ways she may not have been. Bias or what?
Helen Duncan was that very rare type of psychic called a 'Materialistic Medium' She could allegedly make spirits appear in solid form. If Robinson and his crew had gone to see and experienced a Materialistic Medium at work that would have been an OBJECTIVE assessment. But - not knowing their subject? - they didn't.
Finally, that stupid parlour trick created by the expert psychologist ( God save me from experts!) did not prove anything remotely connected with what Helen Duncan could allegedly perform.
All in all a poorly researched and bias production.