I can't believe that Mercedes would not want the number '1' on their own car for next season, or that Button really thinks that a move to Mclaren would help him in any way to get back to back wins!  What does seem obvious is that despite Button's own financial contribution to Brawn GP this season, Mercedes GP obviously don't value him very ...

It's a strange career move from Button I must say.  I'm sure McLaren will be contenders, but what with Brawn GP becoming a works team and with Ross Brawn at the helm, surely the new Mercedes GP car will be the one to beat next season?  Given what Brawn has done this year with a car that wasn't even designed to take the Merc engine, I'd ...

I don't think Kimi won it so much as Lewis gave it all away.  It was always Lewis's for the taking but he and his team made some terrible errors.  With just 2 points in it at the end, those errors inevitably lost him the WDC that year.  But that's F1 for you.  Like any sport you need a certain amount of good luck and good ...

JohnT: anametoremember: JohnT: aveli666:fangio scored 5 championships in 8 years comared with schumachers 7 in 15 years.   Have to say Fangio All his championships where won fairly and within the rules.   Though it is impossible to judge, like Franger said in a post before yours, Fangio moved to team to team for the best car, ...

When you look at it like that I can see where you're coming from, and I think you're probably right.  The cars were much more dangerous and difficult to drive in the fifties than they are now.  Make a mistake then and you'd probably be dead or seriously injured. I consider at least one of Schumacher's titles to be highly dubious and ...

coops3: bingolingo: coops3: bingolingo:I'm using the definition in the Oxford English Dictionary, and it doesn't look anything like your version.  I don't think we'll ever agree that you haven't misinterpreted this statement, and the level of misplaced sensitivity you're displaying over something that is quite inoffensive in both its context ...

coops3: bingolingo:I'm using the definition in the Oxford English Dictionary, and it doesn't look anything like your version.  I don't think we'll ever agree that you haven't misinterpreted this statement, and the level of misplaced sensitivity you're displaying over something that is quite inoffensive in both its context and delivery is ...

coops3:This part: ''but the actual event interested so many people who did not know about the sport.'' I don't know what your definition of popular is, but mine is the amount of interest something attracts. But we're nit-picking now. I'm actually not bothered whose definition we use, so for argument's sake we'll go with yours: ''He said that ...

coops3:So to clarify, are you still maintaining that I've misinterpreted this: ''It was a shame that we had to lose Ayrton, but it happened. He was very popular, but the actual event interested so many people who did not know about the sport'' It's just that I can't see how there's more than one way of interpreting that statement. To clarify, ...

coops3: bingolingo: coops3: bingolingo: kimi'sgirl: moomoo: What he said has nothing to do with you, you didn't hear him say it... just some stupid news and now you lot decide to get angry over it. Like who cares what he said? Too many people these days want to jump on the hate band wagon and everyone knows how easily something can get twisted by ...