Is this the thing that will make out that Daniel wasn't Laurel and Ashley's  baby after all? And people on here were right about the baby-swap storyline.

I really hope not. Emmerdale doesn't need that.

Sorry to break this to you, Joanne, but that is exactly the direction they are going in.

vader:

Sorry to break this to you, Joanne, but that is exactly the direction they are going in.

I did think so but didnt want to believe it. This is one storyline I cannot get behind.

I can't say I'm impressed either. This storyline would be bad enough if Daniel was still alive so Laurel and Ashley would swap babies with another couple but to claim their biological child from another couple and have to tell them that their biological child died!

I really and truly hope that they do not go down this line after carrying out the story so well up to now. It will be an insult to everyone who has lost a baby under any circumstances.

 

 

 

that storyline was in well before baby daniel died you could tell straight off

however whos to say that they will do anthing about it

kim

Oh God no....why do the soaps always copy each other's storylines - swapped at birth - has been boring Coronation Street viewers for what seems like years! (made worse by the fact that Ryan is such a boring character and as for....who?...well enough said)

I have written to the producers - not that they'll listen!

Please Eastenders....don't reveal that Billy Mitchell and  Ian Beale were swapped at birth...how far will this go, Ant & Dec are Morecombe & Wise's real kids?????

PLEASE DON'T PUT US THRU' THIS TORTURE